At the age of 13, Alexia Rubio, a teenage girl, was walking back from the park to her house by herself. On the way, a man jumped out in front of her and sexually assaulted her. Currently, Alexia Rubio is scarred for life and keeps getting nightmares about what happened that day. As of the man who attacked her, a level 2 sex offender, is now in jail. People may say that everyone deserves housing and the right to freedom. However, not every person deserves the “American dream.” In fact some people don’t even deserve any kind of housing at all. A sex offender, one who has been criminally charged and convicted of, or has pleaded guilty to, a sex crime, is the least welcome resident in any city or neighborhood. Sex offenders should not be given the same choices as any other American citizen, because of the severity of the crime they have made. Parents fear for the safety of their kids, and sex offenders have a greater chance of re-offending where kids are near by. Very few sex offenders are able to change their habits and their thoughts of mind and start a new life. This statistic makes people very scared and forcing the city and state to react by making tougher laws against sex offenders. Such laws consist of sex offenders are to stay away a certain distance from schools, parks, pools, and any place where kids are to be playing or living. The best way to prevent sex offenders to strike again is to greater the punishment. Housing is like a privilege, and it is a human right until the privilege is lost by committing a sex crime, especially against a helpless minor.
In recent studies, fewer sex crimes have been committed in the last decade than in the 1990's, and the reports show that the decline in sex crimes is a result in tougher laws, making people aware of the consequences they may face if they commit such a crime. A recent law that has been passed enables a 30-year minimum sentence for those who have sex with a child younger than 12. The U.S. Department of Justice has made fighting sex offenders a top priority, and it seems like they are doing an excellent job of it. People might argue that new laws do more harm than good. Although part of it may seem correct, in the long run it is the right decision made by law makers. This “harsh” punishment will make sex offenders think twice of recommitting a sex crime, or a person to commit a sex crime for the first time. Electronic monitoring, frequent visits by patrol officers and restricted zoning are just some of the ways the U.S. government is helping battle the war between the U.S. citizens and sex offenders. A study from the University of Florida State shows that out of 75,000 sex offenders placed on a GPS monitoring system, 67,500 sex offenders did not re-offend, which is 90% of the entire number of sexual predators tested. People are now aware of the severe consequences of a sex crime, and most are not willing to risk their entire life for a “fantasy” they might have.
The last thing any parent would want is getting a sex offender notice flyer in the mail. In the western culture, sex offenders are never welcomed, because of the threat they pose to anyone. Sex offenders reduce the value of the neighborhood. I believe most sex offenders are not able to change their habit of sexual “fantasies” with minors, and should not be given a second chance to re-offend. Sexual predators, in reality, have a better life in prison, where they get food, a clean shower, and a shelter. It is in the best interest of everyone if sex offenders are kept in a safe place, where they can not devastate any more lives. They should receive the utmost punishment possible, and they should not be given any other shelter besides the jail cell.
Sources:
http://www.metrokc.gov/exec/sexoffenderhousing/
http://moe.ic.highline.edu.2160
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/may/31/local/me-offenders31http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#sex
